Re: Re: Soviet Union - the country big

Hello, qwertyuiop, you wrote: A>> Gorbachev concentrated on  to a problematics, and for persuasiveness showed to the interlocutor a card of directions of rocket attacks across Great Britain, prepared in the USSR on a war case. Q> also what? If they learned about on what cities strike rockets it will be easier to them to be protected from them? If and not to be protected, it is possible, for example, critical objects from a defeat zone to deduce. And so also I, without any cards, can tell that shocks will is put on big cities and prom to centers. Time showed, the sense means had? And, anyway, on a card for certain the signature stamp stood. Here present, the employee at negotiations with competitors discloses any document "", even values for them not having. How you think, its heads for it on a head strokes? Q> Gorbachev understood  a socialism, saw, where it (socialism) got the country and understood that from this bog it is necessary to be selected gradually. Also started it to do according to the lights. "Socialism" or is watered. A manual? Yes, and "the Swedish socialism" is as, to consider or not? And generally is such - "undertook a tug - do not speak that ". Q> Sovkofily can call, of course, it for it the traitor - yes, he betrayed a socialism. But normal people should for it to it a monument deliver. Generally not "socialism", and the country. And if "did not betray", "did not justify trust" - precisely. Q> also do not put only because it appeared the weakling, from it took away the power, and it powerlessly gave it, and the country went to a spacing. And now attention! - who took away? The American interventionists?  from Mars? Is not present - same as it people on high posts. Same "power". Here they it is exact - traitors.